- Ravitch, Diane. "Los Angeles Times: A Wise Editorial about NCLB and Race to Top." Web log post. Diane Ravitch's Blog. N.p., 21 July 2013. Web. 29 Nov. 2013. <http://dianeravitch.net/2013/07/21/los-angeles-times-a-wise-editorial-about-nclb-and-race-to-top/>.
- "Evolution ResourcesFrom the National Academies." Evolution Resources from the National Academies. National Academy of Sciences, n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2013. <http://www.nas.edu/evolution/InSchools.html>.
- Schehl, Pam. "Ohio Court Spars on Science Teacher's Creationist Lessons." News Article. CBSNews. CBS Interactive, 27 Feb. 2013. Web. 25 Nov. 2013. <http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ohio-court-spars-on-science-teachers-creationist-lessons/>.
- "The Effective Teacher versus the Ineffective Teacher?" Examiner.com. Examiner, 19 Sept. 2010. Web. 25 Nov. 2013. <http://www.examiner.com/article/the-effective-teacher-versus-the-ineffective-teacher>.
- Lecker, Wendy, Jonathan Pelto, and Valerie Strauss. "How Grossly Underfunded Are Public Schools?" Washington Post. N.p., 25 Nov. 2012. Web. 25 Nov. 2013. <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2012/11/25/how-grossly-underfunded-are-public-schools/>.
Thursday, January 30, 2014
5 Sources
Works Cited
- Ravitch, Diane. "Los Angeles Times: A Wise Editorial about NCLB and Race to Top." Web log post. Diane Ravitch's Blog. N.p., 21 July 2013. Web. 29 Nov. 2013. <http://dianeravitch.net/2013/07/21/los-angeles-times-a-wise-editorial-about-nclb-and-race-to-top/>.
- "Evolution ResourcesFrom the National Academies." Evolution Resources from the National Academies. National Academy of Sciences, n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2013. <http://www.nas.edu/evolution/InSchools.html>.
- Schehl, Pam. "Ohio Court Spars on Science Teacher's Creationist Lessons." News Article. CBSNews. CBS Interactive, 27 Feb. 2013. Web. 25 Nov. 2013. <http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ohio-court-spars-on-science-teachers-creationist-lessons/>.
- "The Effective Teacher versus the Ineffective Teacher?" Examiner.com. Examiner, 19 Sept. 2010. Web. 25 Nov. 2013. <http://www.examiner.com/article/the-effective-teacher-versus-the-ineffective-teacher>.
- Lecker, Wendy, Jonathan Pelto, and Valerie Strauss. "How Grossly Underfunded Are Public Schools?" Washington Post. N.p., 25 Nov. 2012. Web. 25 Nov. 2013. <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2012/11/25/how-grossly-underfunded-are-public-schools/>.
- "Protecting Bad Teachers." Keeping Bad Teachers in Front of Students. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 Nov. 2013. <http://teachersunionexposed.com/protecting.php>.
- Bowie, Liz. "Class Size Grows in High Schools after Cuts to Teaching Positions." Baltimore Sun. N.p., 11 May 2012. Web. 26 Nov. 2013. <http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-05-11/news/bal-class-size-grows-in-high-schools-after-cuts-to-teaching-positions-20120511_1_class-sizes-large-classes-196teaching>.
- Mosle, Sara. "Does Class Size Count?" Opinionator Does Class Size Count Comments. The New York Times, 4 May 2013. Web. 26 Nov. 2013. <http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/04/does-class-size-count/?_r=0>.
- "Science Teacher, Who Teaches Evolution, Forced to Quit Because of School's Preference of Creationism." God Discussion. N.p., 11 Mar. 2012. Web. 26 Nov. 2013. <http://www.goddiscussion.com/93673/science-teacher-who-teaches-evolution-forced-to-quit-because-of-schools-preference-of-creationism/>.
- Sikhan, Khara. "World Socialist Web Site." Low-income Students Six times More Likely to Drop out of High School -. N.p., 10 Apr. 2013. Web. 26 Nov. 2013. <http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/04/10/hsdo-a10.html>.
Monday, January 27, 2014
Chapter 5: Evaluating Sources
This chapter explains the factors you should use in order
to evaluate a source. The author was able to explain how to thoroughly evaluate
relevance, evidence, the author, the publisher, usage of time, how to
comprehend, as well as how to evaluate the genre of the essay. This was a very
useful chapter because I haven’t thoroughly researched each of these categories
for my topic, but now I know there are numerous options I can explore and use
for my research essay. Evaluating digital sources is a little different than
evaluating field sources, such as interviews, observations, and surveys. This
chapter does a good job of explaining how to go about each source which is very
helpful because I will be using many different sources throughout my paper and I
need to know how to go about each one and how to successfully place it in my
paper. I will definitely keep this chapter in mind because when looking at
sources online, it’s sometimes sketchy and hard to figure out if they’re
credible enough to include in your paper, but now I can use these tips on how
to find good sources for my future essays.
Chapter 4: Reading Critically
The main focus of this chapter is reading critically and
how it can affect your essay. Reading critically is crucial in the world of
writing. Reading critically includes underlining and highlighting text, noting
your reactions, and taking thorough notes. It may be a burden while you’re
reading, but in the end it is very useful and can add on so much information or
thoughts into your essay. To use your research question to read critically, a
good step is to develop a position statement. Typically it may take a few tries
before you are able to come up with a statement that works with your essay
while giving enough information to make sense. Developing a position statement
has always been a little challenging for me, but the steps in this chapter are
very useful. This chapter also describes reading actively and how it can make
an impact on your future papers. Reading actively includes identifying key
information and ideas, writing questions in the margins, recording quotations,
take notes about how you will use the information, connecting sources, etc.
Identifying sources/genres as you read will help you with adding sources in your
own essay, and it’s important to determine what the author’s main point of the
paper is as well. By doing these things it will create a very successful paper
because you’ll know what your audience is looking for.
Chapter 3: Developing Your Research Question and Proposal
The main points in this chapter are how to develop your
research question and how to create a research proposal. This chapter was very
helpful to me because it usually takes me awhile to come up with a research
question, and how I should take action and maintain the same proposal throughout
the whole essay. To develop an effective research question, the first step you
need to take is reflecting on your writing situation. Ask yourself if anything
has changed, what have you learned about your audience, what kind of document
will you write, what sources will be most effective to your essay, etc. By
reflecting on your writing situation, it will allow you to figure out what is
top priority in your paper and how to organize it to make sense to the reader.
Another important thing to do is to generate potential research questions. By
going in depth with these research questions, you can easily narrow them down,
making it easier to generate your focus point. This chapter also lists the
steps to create a research proposal. I’ve never focused on this in an essay but
it’s nice to learn the steps so I can use it in future essays.
Chapter 2: Exploring and Focusing
The main focus points in this chapter are how to explore
your topic and how to focus on an issue. This chapter was super helpful to me because
one of the most difficult parts I have when writing an essay is how to go about
picking a topic and how to explore it, which includes the main points I will
address in my essay. This chapter includes a helpful “Plan to Explore Your
Topic,” which includes talking to people who may have knowledge about the topic
you’re considering, conducting a list of questions that you could potentially
ask them, a list of resources that will be available to you for your paper, as
well as a way to track all of the information you collect. Finding and
reviewing sources is a huge part of this chapter which includes descriptions of
the sources that could be available to you and how you can use them. To focus on
an issue, it’s important to find a topic that has a lot of discussion about it.
Finally, it describes processes you can use to actually pick a topic. This is
very useful to me because I always am very indecisive about what I want to
write about.
Chapter 1: Getting Started
The main point the author is trying to convey in this
chapter is how to go about your research paper and “write with confidence”
which means writing your paper and feeling like it has a strong point, which
readers can relate to. This chapter gives many good pointers on what a good
paper is made up of, including good sources, developing a strong position which
is crucial to a research paper, understanding genres and how important your
audience is, and many others. Another really important thing to do is to
construct a project timeline because it is very common to put it off and/or
lose track of time, especially when the essay is over 2,000 words and has to
contain numerous credible resources throughout the paper. This chapter is very
helpful with including the tips to choose an appropriate topic. These include
analyzing your assignment; who is your audience and what would urge them to
read the paper, what type of document you’re writing. Generating ideas about
appropriate topics; Brainstorming, looping, and clustering are good ways to do
so. Consider your writing situation; decide on the best topic that will give
you the most information while being intriguing and keep the audience’s
attention throughout the paper. Overall this was a very helpful chapter and I
will be using these tips to help me with my paper.
Thursday, January 16, 2014
Tutorial
1. What is the domain?
The domain is .edu
2. What does the title bar say?
No title bar
3. What is some information on the author?
Not much information on the author other than how to contact the writer at morri029@umn.edu
4. When was the article written?
This article was published Tuesday, January 14, 2014.
5. Is the body tect relevant or accurate?
Yes this is relevant because it was published two days ago. The information in the article seems believable because it was performed by a psychology major.
6.What was information in the footers?
It shows the information about the website.
© 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Privacy
Last modified on February 1, 2013
- See more at: http://discover.umn.edu/news/science-technology/donald-simone-studies-mechanisms-pain-relief-cannabinoids#sthash.INhKKb4g.dpuf
The domain is .edu
2. What does the title bar say?
No title bar
3. What is some information on the author?
Not much information on the author other than how to contact the writer at morri029@umn.edu
4. When was the article written?
This article was published Tuesday, January 14, 2014.
5. Is the body tect relevant or accurate?
Yes this is relevant because it was published two days ago. The information in the article seems believable because it was performed by a psychology major.
6.What was information in the footers?
It shows the information about the website.
Paper Topic Brainstorm
- Gun control rights
- Gay rights
- Social Media
- Slavery
- Hunger
- Women's rights
- Sex offenders
- Education policy
Thursday, January 9, 2014
Sample Research Paper Notes
Word requirement 3000: The writer had 4220 so it met it and exceeded.
Grammar and Citations: There were no grammar problems that were visible, and the citations were in the right format.
Signal Phrases, Citations, and Work cited page: Many different signal phrases example “Currently, however, according to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, the official estimate of the American veteran population is approximately 24,816,000 (“Veteran”). “ Citations are clear and numerous. A good work cited page that goes over all quotes and citations.
Persuasion: With all of the work cited and evidence to support their claim the writer was persuading and fair on their topic because they cited counter evidence to their own topic.
Built: The writing was organized and well done, I did not get lost at any point in the essay.
Sources: The writer had 19 sources.
Conclusion: the conclusion was well thought out and reinstated the argument they made in their thesis.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)